環球英文研究三步曲、之一︰星加坡英文
曾曉華
高职中外合作办学项目学生英语学习动机的纵向研究—以广东轻工职业技术学院为例
周斯洋
对于英语学习者来说,动机是提高学习积极性的重要内在动力,也是增强学习效果的重要因素。高职非英语专业的学生,由于自身及客观的因素,普遍存在英语学习动机缺乏,学习自律性不强等问题。基于这种现状,以广东轻工职业学院中外合作办学项目的非英语专业学生为研究对象,结合国内外动机研究成果,分析他们英语学习动机的特点,以期为提高大专非英语专业学生的英语学习动机提供切参考。
Developing Four English-in-the-Discipline Courses for University Studies in Hong Kong
Wang, Wenfeng; Leung, Patrick; Jhaveri, Aditi
ISBN: 9789811510366
Source: Asian Research on English for Specific Purposes: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Asia English for Specific Purposes, 2017 / edited by Youzhong Sun, Liwen Li, Hong Cai. Singapore : Springer, 2017, p. 23-43
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-1037-3_3
This chapter discusses the development of English-in-the-Discipline (ED) courses offered to students of four disciplines: Education, Information Management, Speech and Hearing Sciences, and Applied Child Development at The University of Hong Kong. These courses aim to help students develop their critical reading, report writing, and oral presentation skills for disciplinary studies and academic purposes. Students conduct a small-scale research project on a self-identified topic in their discipline, interview information-rich professionals, and present their findings in the form of a research report and an academic oral presentation. As developers of these courses, we present the course design principles (e.g., genre and experiential learning approaches, and assessment for learning) and sample teaching materials. In light of student feedback, we reflect upon the strengths of the courses in developing students’ academic literacy for university studies and the challenges we experience in relation to (a) specificity in disciplinary communication, (b) collaboration with subject teachers, and (c) language teachers’ expertise in teaching ED courses.
Participants’ Engagement in and Perceptions of English Language MOOCs
Mcminn, Sean W.J.
ISBN: 9781138201576
Source: Faces of English Education: Students, Teachers, and Pedagogy / Lillian L. C. Wong, Ken Hyland, editors. London : Routledge, 2017, p. 176-196
DOI: 10.4324/9781315205618-12
This chapter draws attention to Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOC) designers might be able to anticipate possible participant behaviour or connector types and other engagements that may occur, accounting for various participants' perceived learning and assessment strategies within networked learning. A mixed-methods approach was used, including an analysis of discussion forum activity, online surveys, and clickstream data. These were used to analyse how participants create, define, and experience their roles in LMOOCs. The chapter reveals that participants positioned themselves within the discussion forums in various ways to connect and engage in the course. Four main themes emerged: influential connector, moderate connector, peripheral/distant connector, and dormant connector. While formal tasks can be established for peripheral, dormant, and silent connectors, the design should recognize that some participants will look for ways to cross boundaries and connect with other participants in an LMOOC to adapt to their language-learning goals.
Textual metafunction and theme: What's 'it' about?
Forey, Gail; Sampson, Nicholas
ISBN: 9781315413884
Source: The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics / Edited by Tom Bartlett, Gerard O'Grady. London : Routledge, 2017, p. 131-145, Ch. 9, 1st Edition
DOI: 10.4324/9781315413891
As established by Halliday (Halliday and Matthiessen 2014),1 systemic functional linguistics (SFL) models language in social context and recognises three general social functions for which language is used: (a) enacting our social relationships; (b) representing our experience to each other and (c) organising our enactments and representations as meaningful text. These are known as the ‘metafunctions’: the interpersonal metafunction enacts relationships; the ideational metafunction represents experience and the textual metafunction organises text. When discussing the three metafunctions, Halliday (1978: 113) points out that ‘the textual function has an enabling function with respect to the other two; it is only in combination with textual meanings that ideational and interpersonal meanings are actualized’. The textual metafunction is realised by the choices a speaker or a writer makes in combining the ideas and reality that he or she wishes to express (ideational), along with the relationship that he or she hopes to project and develop (interpersonal). The organisation of the ideational and the interpersonal plays a key role in developing what it is we mean and how we relate to those with whom we want to interact through language. Halliday (1977: 181) states that the function of the textual metafunction is: specifically that of creating a text, of making the difference between language in the abstract and language in use in other words, it is through the semantic options of the textual component that language comes to be relevant to its environment.